• Home
  • Mending Mondays #4: With Might Like This, Who Needs Weakness?

Mending Mondays #4: With Might Like This, Who Needs Weakness?

by - 7 years ago

While a lot of people scream for nerfs when cards feel overpowered, I don’t see many people calling for buffs to long forgotten cards. In my mind, every non-joke card should at least be a decent fit in a viable deck. Also, the meta would grow a lot more interesting if a wider array of cards suddenly started seeing play. So without further ado…

Welcome back to Mending Mondays, a weekly feature where I, Dannie “IAmDiR23” Ray will take a look at some of the worst cards in the Hearthstone Classic Set and evaluate why they are deemed to be horrible, and what could be done to fix them.


TotemicMight

Totemic Might, showing once again that 0 mana cards are really hard to balance. Totemic is a card whose effect can be really usable, but overall the card feels too situational to fit in an all purpose deck. For a card like Totemic Might to even sniff viability you would have to build the deck around it. And while a Totemic Might deck could end up being at least decent, it just won’t cut it.

Why is it so bad?

Totemic Might gives your Totems +2 Health, unless paired with Mana Tide Totem its likely to lose card advantage. Sure, there’s the rare occasion where you will be able to make your Searing Totem trade with a enemy 2/1 and stay alive. Or that the extra 2 hp on your Taunt totem is just the thing that would keep you alive. Maybe you’ll get yourself on a situation that making the Spell Power totem survive is key to winning the game. I don’t know, of all the games i’ve played as a shaman I can count with one hand the number of times when I wished I had Totemic Might on my hand instead of some other card. In contrast, in almost every game comes a point where I wish I had an Hex, Fire Elemental, Rockbiter Weapon, or a Lightning Storm.

To summarize:

  • WAY too situational
  • Hard to get value out of
  • Can be a dead card for too long

What’s the Design Intent?

One would think that the idea here is mainly to power up your totems, likely as a cheap spell. Totemic Might seems to work better when combined with Mana Tide and Flametongue, but those cards are strong enough on their own so I wouldn’t clasify Totemic Might as a niche spell designed for themed combo decks.

Additional Notes

Totemic Might its at it best (or should we say least bad?) when taking advantage cards that synergize with cheap spells and having a lot of totems around. You can probably build a deck with cheap spells that tries to unleash a big Bloodlust on Totems and Tokens, you might win some games but I don’t think its near the strongest options that Shaman has.

BLOODLUSTVioletTeacherGadgetzan

Possible Improvements

Basically, needs cards needs more bang for its buck. But just like Savagery last week, it’s low cost prohibits having a world breaking effect. So you are most likely having to raise the mana cost so we can have an effect worth packing in your deck.

Now as for the effect, Totemic Might is exactly the type of card I wish you could cycle out of your hand. Again, adding a card draw would most likely warrant upping the mana cost. The other option is changing the effect to Attack instead of Health.  Imagine the possibilities, Totemic might could enable some pretty decent early trades. Or it could be the last few points of damage you needed for lethal.

The Results

TotemicMightFix

Maybe lorewise it doesn’t make much sense to have the non-searing totems attack. But we don’t need flavor, we need value. You are not guaranteed to have totems up, but in the right set up this could become a very mana efficient way to do damage. I bumped the cost to 1 just to err on the safe side, but I’d like to playtest this for a while. I’m not exactly sure how good or bad it could end up being, what do you guys think?

 

TotemicMightFix2

This one is truer to the original intention of the card, it is highly situational but this won’t be a dead card. Even without totems you can just cycle it for one mana. Even using it on a single totem you just summoned could end up being advantageous. Unlike the Hunter’s Flare which has a devastating effect against secret heavy decks, Totemic Might’s effect is small enough that a 1-mana draw wouldn’t exactly be overpowered.

 

Also on the plus side, these two versions of Totemic Might work with Gazlowe. But you could also go Vanilla and just buff the current card to 3 or even 4 health.


Which card should we do next? Let me know using the comment section or via Twitter @DannieRay23

 

 


posted in Hearthstone
JR Cook

JR has been writing for fan sites since 2000 and has been doing Blizzard Exclusive fansites since 2003. He helped co-found BlizzPro in 2013. You can hear JR every week talk about Hearthstone on the Well Met Podcast published on iTunes.


0 responses to “Mending Mondays #4: With Might Like This, Who Needs Weakness?”

  1. Mark Davis says:

    Adding card draw is probably the coolest option for improving this card.

    • Rubenmv says:

      Yeah, I think right now Shaman needs some card draw. Also health may be good to keep something alive on the early game and then use Argus or Flametongue with it.

  2. Alex De'spark says:

    I’d say why wont we follow GvG scheme? For example
    3 mana spell summon 4 random totems. (Maybe 4 totems is too much Idk)
    These include Manatide Flametongue, vitality and your basic ones.
    May result in hilarious situations where you summon 4 manatides and mill yourself.

  3. TheZmASTER says:

    Bit late, but here’s my two cents (By that I mean half an article):

    I agree that activating (especially silenced) totems would be very helpful, because sometimes the 7-card maximum can get you in trouble when your opponent silences your flametonge and/or mana tide totem, and your board is already filled with small guys that you cannot get rid of and don’t attack.

    But giving +2 (permanently) on all totems for just 1 would be a bit too much, and it would make Bloodlust for 5 mana (almost?) obsolete. Any shaman could be able to get 3 totems out, often more than once each game, buffing attack for +6 for 1 mana is a bit absurd. Put a Sludge belcher next to them and have a good one.

    Remember that there are more than 4 totems, it would also work on flametongue, mana tide and the GvG one that heals the hero, so you could easily play 2 totems before playing one or two buffs. And it’s buffing the hero power, so never a problem to get at least some value out of it.

    Consider a board with only 2 basic totems, opponent traded nicely with the rest of your stuff (belcher), last turn and put up a yeti.
    – Next turn (turn 8 or +) Drop 2 of these for 2 mana for +4 attack, add a flametongue in the middle making them 6 attack. Then drop enhance-o-mechano (4) or just give one of them windfury (for 2).

    – Your 2 totems could wreck havoc for 12-24 damage, so 18 if enhance-o gives just one of them windfury, while you don’t even have to choose to play Flametonge after the totemic mights or Enhanco (because your board will always profit from the extra buffs and there are only 2 totems that can attack right away, so just in between is fine).

    So the burst is incredible, and with one bubble you could even clear the yeti or druid of the claw for free.

    Worst case you don’t have lethal and all get taunt from enhance-o, leaving you with a 6/2 taunt a 4/3 taunt and a 5/2 enhanco. if you would trade the one between flametongue and enhanco.

    Just saying it’s a bit cheap to cast and big on attack.

    Alternatives:
    Maybe +1/+2 for 2 mana would be great. On turn 3 with coin you could already make a decent trade with for example a 2/3 and a 1/4 totem with flametongue in the middle (4/3 and 3/4) and maybe keeping both totems alive. that’s a simple 2 card combo and 2 totems.

    or maybe even +1/+1 for 2, a bit worse than power of the wild. You could consider giving it overcharge for 1 to balance between 2 and 3 mana.

    I think at +1/+2 for 2+1 overload would already be interesting to play it, but maybe just 2 mana would be good.